You are all thrice blessed at this special time of year:
You have the blessings of the Lord, who laid down his earthly body for your eternal salvation.
You have the blessings of your fellows who, I'm sure, are keen to wish you abundant spiritual blessings when they hand you a chocolate Easter egg.
And you have the very thoughtful blessings of your humble servant, the Medieval Monk, who has gone to great pains to exploit the British Library's catalogue of illuminated manuscripts in order to bless your eyes with Easter related images.
Why, just look at that exquisite Easter monogram at the top! Reminiscent of the type of artwork seen on my shores, here in England, but actually produced by my Benedictine brethren at the monastery of Santos Domingo de Silos in eleventh-century Spain. Delightful!
But a medieval Easter is not all exquisite interlacing and zoomorphic illumination. No, for there is much work to be done...
One of the most arduous of Easter related tasks is working out when to celebrate it. "Why don't we just celebrate it at the same time every year?" is something I've heard many a time from spiritually absent twenty-first century folk.
But you have it easy, beloved ones. You get the dates given to you on your wizzardrous phone-cum-diary-app thingies. Whereas us medieval folk have a history of arguing about which method of computus we should use. You doubt me? Have you seen those Easter tables?
Yes, back in AD 664, the great and the good of my land held a big assembly at the monastery of the Abbess Hild in Whitby, in the presence of no less than King Oswui, all to come to some agreement about the best way to determine future dates for the celebration of Easter.
At least four different Easter tables and types of computus were addressed at the synod. There were a few squabbles, I can tell you, claims and counter claims about apostolic provenance; and a number of fibs were told, too, including a big whopper by Wilfrid of Northumbria who said that the tables he used were also used in Rome 'where the apostles St Peter and St Paul lived, taught, suffered, and were buried, . . . everywhere in Italy and Gaul . . ., at one and the same time in Africa, Asia, Egypt, Greece, and throughout the whole world'.
The conflicting claims to apostolic support of various computus led one of the spokesmen, the Irish monk and bishop of Northumbria, Colmán, to concede that really it was St Peter who held the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, to which the king abruptly responded that the bishop of Rome must therefore surely know the correct Easter!
Well, to cut a long story short (yes, I know you're dreaming of biting the ears off chocolate bunnies), and to fast forward a few decades: the great time-calculating historian and monk, Bede, when reporting on the controversy, accepted the conclusion reached at Whitby, adopting what are known as the Dionysian tables; he adapted these for his own computus, which he explains in his famous work, and great bedtime reading, De temporibus (written AD 703), adding further details in De temporum ratione (AD 716-25); before eventually (that is, by the ninth century) everyone in the British Isles and the schools and dioceses of the Carolingian empire accepted good old Bede's way of reckoning things; and in due course, by the tenth century, even the diocese and the province of Rome had gone all Bedan. Ta dah!
There, that's just what you needed, is it not, blessed ones, to prepare you for this most spiritually uplifting time of year. No?! Oh, alright, then, just look at the nice pictures.
And save me some chocolate...
Information on the 'Easter Controversy' adapted from Wesley M. Stevens entry in The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England (Blackwell, 1999), ed. Michael Lapidge et al, pp. 155-57.