The Medieval Monk

Blogum scribo

Picture
  • Welcome
  • What I do
  • Blog
  • Projects & Publications
  • Buy me a coffee
  • Contact Me

22/7/2014

Leave it to the ladies? The problem of the Bayeux Tapestry erection

6 Comments

Read Now
 
Picture
​Dr Monk casts his wandering gaze upon the unseemly nakedness of the Bayeux Tapestry                        
Image: A naked 'Adam' and 'Eve': Public Domain: Wikimedia Commons
​Image modified. 
 
Whilst carrying out some research on the naked characters inhabiting the borders of the Bayeux Tapestry, I came across a wonderful, gendered tirade by a certain Miss Agnes Strickland, author of the 1853 work Lives of the Queens of England.
Her gripe was against contemporary masculine interventions into the issue of restored figures in the famous eleventh-century embroidery.  With quintessential, restrained Victorian ire, Strickland wrote:
‘With all due deference to the judgement of the lords of creation on all subjects connected with policy and science, we venture to think that our learned friends, the archæologists and antiquaries, would do well to devote their intellectual powers to more masculine objects of enquiry, and leave the question of the Bayeux tapestry (with all other matters allied to needle-craft) to the decision of the ladies to whose province it belongs. It is a matter of doubt to us whether one, out of many gentlemen who have disputed Mathilda’s claim to the work, if called upon to execute a copy of either of the figures on canvas, would know how to put in the first stitch’! 
Leaving aside what appears to be a misplaced defence of Queen Mathilda’s actual handiwork – no Bayeux Tapestry scholar, female or male, would today attribute even the commissioning of the Tapestry to the wife of William the Conqueror – I find myself rather moved by Strickland’s needled vehemence.  After all, she has a serious point: don’t comment on things about which you don’t understand! 
I’m not agreeing per se with Strickland’s gender bias, but I do think it is relevant, when attempting to argue about meanings within the Tapestry, that we recognize the importance of practical knowledge of embroidery production. 
Which brings me back to my involvement with the Tapestry’s naked figures. I have to confess that in writing the initial draft of my chapter for a forthcoming collection of essays on the Bayeux Tapestry, I rather ignored the issue of post-medieval needlework restoration – or should I say I was actually ignorant of the extent of this in connection with the naked figures. 
You see, to get to the point, I have a naked man in the lower border – let’s call him Adam – who may or may not have an erection! He certainly has one now – rather serpentine, if truth be told.  
But in drawings of the Tapestry, commissioned by a certain Bernard de Montfaucon and published in 1730, the bottom half of the man is missing. Never mind a penis, Adam doesn’t even have legs! 
However, his active member is apparent in the later drawings by Charles Stothard, published between 1818 and 1823, though Stothard’s version of the man’s legs are not as they appear now on the Tapestry. 
You see my problem? 
There was no point in me waffling on in my chapter for this book about the metonymic significance of this man’s overt masculinity to the Bayeux Tapestry’s overall narrative (yawn) if there wasn’t an erection in the first place. 
So you see, with Strickland’s words ringing in my ears, I realised that I needed an expert in medieval embroidery. 
Luck would have it that my friend and former colleague at the University of Manchester, Alex Makin, is both an expertly trained embroiderer (Royal School of Needlework) and an expert researcher  of medieval embroidery.  (She is also contributing a chapter to the new book.) 
So I have put Adam’s problematic penis in her hands ... better rephrase that ... I have asked Alex for her professional opinion on the stitch work of the offending scene. 
In due course, we will hopefully all know, with a higher degree of certainty, whether or not Adam had an eleventh-century erection. So stay tuned.
But, alas!  If only Miss Agnes Strickland were still alive!  I’m convinced she would have been delighted at my careful scholarship.
If you'd like to have your say on this vitally important issue, please leave your comment below

Share

6 Comments
Alex Makin
22/7/2014 10:09:43 am

How I laughed at your turn of phrase! I am working on it as I type; oh, that sounds a bit ... too.
A very good point made. There has been some interesting work over the last decade discussing the importance of including people with knowledge of different crafts in academic research, see for instance: Martin Ciszuk, 'The Academic Craftsman - a discussion on knowledge of craft in textile research', Ancient Textiles Production, Craft and Society ed. by Carole Gillis and Marie-Louise B. Nosch (Oxford: Oxbow, 2008), pp. 13-15.

Reply
Chris (The Anglo-Saxon Monk)
22/7/2014 10:18:40 am

Ah, thanks Alex, I will check out that article. Apologies for the mildly obscene language. It somehow seemed most appropriate.

Reply
Alex
22/7/2014 11:55:38 am

No problem. You know my sense of humour and yes, it was very appropriate.

Anna
23/7/2014 03:01:38 am

For those interested in the book in which Chris's article will appear, its details are:
Making Sense of the Bayeux Tapestry: Readings and Reworkings, edited by Anna Henderson and Gale R. Owen-Crocker. It is scheduled for publication by Manchester University Press in early 2016.

Reply
Nancy Scott
16/6/2017 12:45:45 pm

lol

Reply
Priscilla
8/3/2022 03:26:42 am

8======D

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

Details

    Author

    Welcome, blessed readers! This is the blog of the Medieval Monk, the alter ego of Dr Christopher Monk.

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

cookieassistant.com
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Welcome
  • What I do
  • Blog
  • Projects & Publications
  • Buy me a coffee
  • Contact Me